R v Shirley Justins [2011] NSWSC 568
Given that the sentence already served by the offender adequately reflects the criminality of the present offence, and considering the circumstances and history of the prosecution, the only appropriate sentence is to sentence the offender to the rising of the Court.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Convicted of the offence of Aid and Abet Suicide; sentenced to the rising of the Court.
- Legal Topics
- ['aid and Abet Suicide' 'sentencing' 'criminal Responsibility']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for aiding and abetting the suicide of Graeme Wylie under s 31C(1) of the Crimes Act 1900?']
Ratio Decidendi
Given that the sentence already served by the offender adequately reflects the criminality of the present offence, and considering the circumstances and history of the prosecution, the only appropriate sentence is to sentence the offender to the rising of the Court.
Court Disposition
Convicted of the offence of Aid and Abet Suicide; sentenced to the rising of the Court.
Orders
- ['Offender convicted of aiding and abetting suicide.' 'Sentenced to the rising of the Court.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment