Ambulance Control Centre (State) Award, Re [2011] NSWIRComm 23
The Full Bench considered that, despite substantial disagreement about classifications, rates, employment conditions and transitional arrangements, there was sufficient common ground about a single Control Centre award, the suitability of the Operational Ambulance Officers (State) Award as a foundation, and the need for a modern instrument addressing new technology. Having regard to the Ambulance Service's objective, wage history, earlier proceedings, work value and avoidance of unfairness in transition, the Full Bench formulated a Recommendation under s 134(2) of the Industrial Relations Act 1996.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Award and Industrial Dispute Proceedings Concerning Restructuring of Ambulance Service of NSW Control Centres / Statement and Recommendation After Unsuccessful Conciliation and Further Conciliation Before the Full Bench
- Outcome
- Recommendation made; parties directed to advise the Full Bench of acceptance or rejection of the Recommendation.
- Legal Topics
- ['ambulance Control Centre Restructuring' 'new Single Award' 'award Variation' 'classification Structure' 'rates of Pay' 'transitional Arrangements' 'work Value']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Award and Industrial Dispute Proceedings Concerning Restructuring of Ambulance Service of NSW Control Centres / Statement and Recommendation After Unsuccessful Conciliation and Further Conciliation Before the Full Bench
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a new Ambulance Control Centre (State) Award should be made to provide a modernised award structure for Control Centre employees.' 'Whether the Operational Ambulance Managers (State) Award should be varied to restore parity for Control Centre managers with their on road colleagues.' 'Whether proposed classifications and rates of pay for Control Centre Officers, Duty Operations Control Centre Officers and Senior Operations Control Centre Officers were adequate.' 'How transitional arrangements should address existing paramedic-qualified employees, call takers and non-paramedic dispatchers affected by the proposed single award.' 'Whether the Full Bench should make a recommendation under s 134(2) of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 to resolve the areas of disagreement.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Full Bench considered that, despite substantial disagreement about classifications, rates, employment conditions and transitional arrangements, there was sufficient common ground about a single Control Centre award, the suitability of the Operational Ambulance Officers (State) Award as a foundation, and the need for a modern instrument addressing new technology. Having regard to the Ambulance Service's objective, wage history, earlier proceedings, work value and avoidance of unfairness in transition, the Full Bench formulated a Recommendation under s 134(2) of the Industrial Relations Act 1996.
Court Disposition
Recommendation made; parties directed to advise the Full Bench of acceptance or rejection of the Recommendation.
Orders
- ['The parties are to consider the Recommendation and are directed to advise the Full Bench of their acceptance or rejection of the Recommendation at 9.30 am on Thursday 24 March 2011.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment