Re: Ambulance Service of New South Wales and Broken Hill Town Employees' Union [2004] NSWIRComm 73
The Union bore the onus of establishing on a proper evidentiary basis that the roster proposed by the Service required ambulance officers to perform work that was unjust or unreasonable. Because the alleged past practices and privileges were not clearly identified, the Union's concerns about reconciliation of hours and training were largely speculative, the roster had operated on trial for almost three years, and there was no evidence of actual disadvantage or unfairness, the Commission was not persuaded to interfere with the Service's management of the roster and largely adopted the Service's proposed clauses.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Dispute Notifications Pursuant to S130 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 Concerning Rosters / Arbitration Decision After Compulsory Conferences
- Outcome
- The Service's proposed modified roster agreement was largely adopted, with the Union's non-mandatory no-disadvantage wording included in the scope clause, and the dispute proceedings were concluded.
- Legal Topics
- ['ambulance Officer Rosters' 'modified Hours Roster Agreement' 'management Prerogative' 'past Practices and Privileges' 'reconciliation of Hours' 'on Call Requirements' 'education and Training' 'maintenance of Roster']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Industrial Dispute Notifications Pursuant to S130 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 Concerning Rosters / Arbitration Decision After Compulsory Conferences
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the modified roster proposed by the Ambulance Service of New South Wales imposed unjust or unreasonable conditions on ambulance officers at Broken Hill.' 'Whether broad references to existing past practices and privileges should be preserved in the modified roster agreement.' 'Whether reconciliation of hours for annual leave, long service leave, education and training should operate as proposed by the Service.' "Whether the Service's proposed on call and roster maintenance provisions should be adopted."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Union bore the onus of establishing on a proper evidentiary basis that the roster proposed by the Service required ambulance officers to perform work that was unjust or unreasonable. Because the alleged past practices and privileges were not clearly identified, the Union's concerns about reconciliation of hours and training were largely speculative, the roster had operated on trial for almost three years, and there was no evidence of actual disadvantage or unfairness, the Commission was not persuaded to interfere with the Service's management of the roster and largely adopted the Service's proposed clauses.
Court Disposition
The Service's proposed modified roster agreement was largely adopted, with the Union's non-mandatory no-disadvantage wording included in the scope clause, and the dispute proceedings were concluded.
Orders
- ["The Service's proposed clause encompassing all past practices and privileges relating to roster and attending training schools was to be reflected in the new agreement." "The Service's proposed reconciliation of hours clause for education and training was to be included in the agreement." "The Service's proposed...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment