Sipad Holding & Anor v Popovic, Nikola & Ors [1995] FCA 894

Amendments to the application are permitted as there is power to do so and no party will suffer relevant prejudice since the main issues and relief have been clear from the outset.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 12 October 1995
Procedural Posture: Application / Interlocutory—notices of Motion for Amendment
Outcome: Orders made permitting amendments
Legal Topics: ['amendment of Pleadings' 'share Ownership' 'directorship' 'resolutions and Constitutional Changes']

['corporations Law'] ['amendment of Pleadings' 'share Ownership' 'directorship' 'resolutions and Constitutional Changes']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application / Interlocutory—notices of Motion for Amendment

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether to allow amendments to pleadings, including changes to parties and relief sought' 'Whether amendments would prejudice any party' 'Clarification of main issue as to share ownership and director status']

Ratio Decidendi

Amendments to the application are permitted as there is power to do so and no party will suffer relevant prejudice since the main issues and relief have been clear from the outset.

Court Disposition

Orders made permitting amendments

Orders

['Orders 1, 2, 3 and 4 made on notice of motion dated 11 October 1995' 'Orders 1 and 2 made on notice of motion dated 12 October 1995' 'Costs occasioned by the amendments to be paid by the applicants']