Makari v TAL Life Ltd (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 775
Leave to amend should be granted because the amendment raises an arguable issue on the proper construction of the insurance policy and s 47 of the Insurance Contracts Act, and provided factual matters can be determined on existing lay evidence, but only on conditions ensuring no disputed factual issue remains as to continuity of the medical condition and limiting expert evidence accordingly to prevent unfair prejudice to the plaintiff.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Leave to Amend Defence; Interlocutory Ruling
- Outcome
- Leave to amend the defence granted conditionally
- Legal Topics
- ['amendment of Pleadings' 'insurance Contracts' 'exclusion Clauses' 'interpretation of Insurance Policies']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Leave to Amend Defence; Interlocutory Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to the defendant to amend its defence to include allegations based on cl 9.2 of the Policy' 'Proper construction of cl 9.2 of the insurance policy' 'Whether s 47 of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) prohibits reliance on cl 9.2' 'Whether granting leave would require further expert medical evidence, and whether conditions should attach to any such leave']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to amend should be granted because the amendment raises an arguable issue on the proper construction of the insurance policy and s 47 of the Insurance Contracts Act, and provided factual matters can be determined on existing lay evidence, but only on conditions ensuring no disputed factual issue remains as to continuity of the medical condition and limiting expert evidence accordingly to prevent unfair prejudice to the plaintiff.
Court Disposition
Leave to amend the defence granted conditionally
Orders
- ['Grant leave to the defendant to amend its defence by filing an amended defence in the terms of the revised draft attached to the email dated 12 May 2020.' 'Leave is conditional on the defendant accepting that the cyst diagnosed as cancerous on 23 December 2010 was the same, or substantially the same, medical...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment