Connections Total Fitness for the Family Pty Limited v Selkirk Pastoral Co Pty Limited (No. 2) [2014] NSWSC 471
The proposed consequential loss amendments would necessitate the recall of witnesses, contradict prior representations about the scope of the damages hearing and would undermine the basis on which hearings were separated; for procedural fairness and proper case management, the amendments are disallowed at this stage.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Amendment to Statement of Claim
- Outcome
- Amendments proposing consequential loss claims disallowed; uncontentious amendments allowed.
- Legal Topics
- ['amendment of Pleadings' 'separation of Hearings' 'consequential Loss Claims']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Amendment to Statement of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiffs should be permitted to amend the statement of claim to include consequential loss claims after the hearings were split and findings made in the contract hearing']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed consequential loss amendments would necessitate the recall of witnesses, contradict prior representations about the scope of the damages hearing and would undermine the basis on which hearings were separated; for procedural fairness and proper case management, the amendments are disallowed at this stage.
Court Disposition
Amendments proposing consequential loss claims disallowed; uncontentious amendments allowed.
Orders
- ['The amendment proposed in paragraph 30(c) of the proposed Further Amended Statement of Claim is disallowed.' 'Other proposed amendments may be made.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment