The Owners – Strata Plan 64757 v Sydney Remedial Builders Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 536
Leave to amend granted as it was not sufficiently clear that the defendant’s proposed time bar plea was inconsistent with any admission or with the contract’s operation; the interpretation of practical completion date and certificate, as well as the definition's reference to dispute resolution (including litigation), requires further hearing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Amend List Response / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Leave to amend granted
- Legal Topics
- ['amendment of Pleadings' 'time Bar' 'building Contracts']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Amend List Response / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to amend List Response to plead proceedings are statute barred under s 18E Home Building Act 1989 (NSW)' 'Whether the Certificate of Practical Completion is conclusive proof of practical completion date']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to amend granted as it was not sufficiently clear that the defendant’s proposed time bar plea was inconsistent with any admission or with the contract’s operation; the interpretation of practical completion date and certificate, as well as the definition's reference to dispute resolution (including litigation), requires further hearing.
Court Disposition
Leave to amend granted
Orders
- ['Grant leave to the Defendant to file an Amended List Response in the form that appears in Exhibit 1 at pp 43-50, save that the allegations which currently appear in cl 14(c) will now be incorporated into cl 14(b), thus making it clear that they relate only to the allegations contained in cl 14(b).' 'Parties to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment