Daire v Haley [2023] NSWSC 77
Leave to amend and file a cross-claim is granted despite lateness because the issue of a resulting trust was earlier mooted in the proceedings and not wholly outside the Plaintiffs’ preparation; potential prejudice to the Plaintiffs can be addressed by allowing them to respond; and addressing any issues relating to bankruptcy and interests of a trustee may require further hearing. The balance of justice favours allowing the amendment, but costs are reserved and the matter adjourned for further directions.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Kimberley Jane Daire; Second Plaintiff: Nikki Ann Daire; First Defendant: Thomas Murray Haley; Second Defendant: Registrar-General of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceeding / Interlocutory Hearing on Amendment and Cross Claim
- Outcome
- Leave to amend and cross-claim granted; hearing adjourned; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Cross Claim, Constructive Trust, Resulting Trust, Bankruptcy, Real Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kimberley Jane Daire
First Plaintiff
Nikki Ann Daire
Second Plaintiff
Thomas Murray Haley
First Defendant
Registrar-General of New South Wales
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceeding / Interlocutory Hearing on Amendment and Cross Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to Defendant to amend defence and file cross-claim for a resulting trust
- 2 Whether the late amendment causes prejudice or delay justifying refusal of leave
- 3 Whether possible issues relating to Defendant's bankruptcy and trustee’s interest require further hearing and joinder
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to amend and file a cross-claim is granted despite lateness because the issue of a resulting trust was earlier mooted in the proceedings and not wholly outside the Plaintiffs’ preparation; potential prejudice to the Plaintiffs can be addressed by allowing them to respond; and addressing any issues relating to bankruptcy and interests of a trustee may require further hearing. The balance of justice favours allowing the amendment, but costs are reserved and the matter adjourned for further directions.
Court Disposition
Leave to amend and cross-claim granted; hearing adjourned; costs reserved.
Orders
- Grants leave to Defendant to file the Notice of Motion in Court.
- Grants leave to Defendant to file Amended Defence and Cross-Claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment