Herold v Seally (No 4) [2017] FCA 957
The applicants' proposed pleadings, while perhaps not ideal in form, do not suffer from the fatal defects asserted by the respondents and should not be struck out. The applicants are entitled to proceed with their proposed amended statement of claim.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Lars Herold; Second Applicant: Green Light Group Pte Ltd (Singapore Company Registration No 20121505Z); First Respondent: Jonathon Seally; Second Respondent: Podway Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim / Interlocutory Decision on Application for Leave to Amend
- Outcome
- Leave to amend statement of claim granted; respondents to pay applicants' costs of the application.
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Trade Marks, Copyright, Australian Consumer Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lars Herold
First Applicant
Green Light Group Pte Ltd (Singapore Company Registration No 20121505Z)
Second Applicant
Jonathon Seally
First Respondent
Podway Ltd
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim / Interlocutory Decision on Application for Leave to Amend
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted for applicants to file an amended statement of claim including claims under Australian Consumer Law
- 2 Whether proposed pleadings are vexatious, embarrassing, or liable to be struck out
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants' proposed pleadings, while perhaps not ideal in form, do not suffer from the fatal defects asserted by the respondents and should not be struck out. The applicants are entitled to proceed with their proposed amended statement of claim.
Court Disposition
Leave to amend statement of claim granted; respondents to pay applicants' costs of the application.
Orders
- The applicants be granted leave to file an amended statement of claim in the form provided by email to the associate to Justice Bromwich on 9 August 2017.
- The respondents pay the applicants' costs of and incidental to the application for leave to file the amended statement of claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment