LFI Ventures Pty Ltd v Carter, in the matter of Australian Vocational Learning Institute Pty Ltd (in liq) [2021] FCA 1555

LFI Ventures Pty Ltd v Carter, in the matter of Australian Vocational Learning Institute Pty Ltd (in liq) [2021] FCA 1555

Leave to amend the Originating Process was granted because of the short delay, absence of prejudice to defendants, adequacy of explanation, desirability of avoiding a multiplicity of proceedings, potential factual overlap, and the broad discretion under the rules and relevant legal principles. Claims can properly be heard together at this early stage and no factor outweighed granting leave; costs of the Interlocutory Process are to be paid by the defendants.

Parties
First Plaintiff: LFI Ventures Pty Ltd; Second Plaintiff: Paul Andrew Lange; First Defendant: Moira Kathleen Carter; Second Defendant: Australian Vocational Learning Institute Pty Ltd (in liquidation); Third Defendant: Commonwealth of Australia by and through the Department of Education, Skills and Employment
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 December 2021
Procedural Posture
Corporations and Corporate Insolvency / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Amend Originating Process, Prior to Filing Points of Defence
Outcome
Leave to amend Originating Process granted; costs awarded to plaintiffs.
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Liquidator Removal, Proof of Debt, Leave to Amend Originating Process, No Prejudice, Delay, Overlap Between Claims

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

LFI Ventures Pty Ltd

First Plaintiff

Paul Andrew Lange

Second Plaintiff

Moira Kathleen Carter

First Defendant

Australian Vocational Learning Institute Pty Ltd (in liquidation)

Second Defendant

Commonwealth of Australia by and through the Department of Education, Skills and Employment

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Corporations and Corporate Insolvency / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Amend Originating Process, Prior to Filing Points of Defence

  1. 1 Should leave be granted to amend the Originating Process to include a claim for removal of the Liquidator?
  2. 2 Is there undue delay or prejudice?
  3. 3 Is the Removal Claim sufficiently substantiated to warrant inclusion?

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to amend the Originating Process was granted because of the short delay, absence of prejudice to defendants, adequacy of explanation, desirability of avoiding a multiplicity of proceedings, potential factual overlap, and the broad discretion under the rules and relevant legal principles. Claims can properly be heard together at this early stage and no factor outweighed granting leave; costs of the Interlocutory Process are to be paid by the defendants.

Court Disposition

Leave to amend Originating Process granted; costs awarded to plaintiffs.

Orders

  • Leave granted to file Amended Originating Process within 7 days.
  • Defendants to pay plaintiffs' costs of Interlocutory Process dated 29 September 2021.