Southern Region SLSA Helicopter Rescue Service Pty Ltd v New South Wales Golf Club Co Ltd t/as New South Wales Golf Club [2021] NSWSC 1493
Leave to amend was granted in part: specifically, to amend paragraph C9(b)(ii) based on documentary evidence (the invoice to Landcom), but refused as to the National Trust allegation and the additional allegation of contributory negligence due to prejudice to the plaintiff and lateness of the amendments. Leave to serve further evidence was granted only in relation to specific, relevant, and responsive paragraphs of the affidavits, while inadmissible or irrelevant parts were refused.
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Southern Region SLSA Helicopter Rescue Service Pty Ltd; Defendant/applicant: New South Wales Golf Club Co Ltd trading as New South Wales Golf Club
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application – Ruling on Amendments and Further Evidence
- Outcome
- Proposed amendments to the List Response and further evidence allowed in part, otherwise refused.
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Leave to Adduce Further Evidence, Amicus Curiae Procedures (technology and Construction List)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Southern Region SLSA Helicopter Rescue Service Pty Ltd
Plaintiff/respondent
New South Wales Golf Club Co Ltd trading as New South Wales Golf Club
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application – Ruling on Amendments and Further Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant should be granted leave to amend the List Response under several clauses
- 2 Whether the defendant should be permitted to serve further evidence in the form of affidavits
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to amend was granted in part: specifically, to amend paragraph C9(b)(ii) based on documentary evidence (the invoice to Landcom), but refused as to the National Trust allegation and the additional allegation of contributory negligence due to prejudice to the plaintiff and lateness of the amendments. Leave to serve further evidence was granted only in relation to specific, relevant, and responsive paragraphs of the affidavits, while inadmissible or irrelevant parts were refused.
Court Disposition
Proposed amendments to the List Response and further evidence allowed in part, otherwise refused.
Orders
- Parties to confer and agree on orders necessary to give effect to the reasons
- Matter stood over for further directions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment