Noakes and anor v Adams and anor (supplemental) [2005] NSWIRComm 107
The Court clarified what was implicit in the earlier judgment by granting the applicants leave to amend the summons in the form attached to their notice of motion filed 4 November 2004, while otherwise leaving the earlier interlocutory orders unchanged because jurisdiction and power arguments could still be raised later if appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Supplementary Interlocutory Judgment
- Outcome
- Leave granted to amend; costs reserved; liberty to apply with respect to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['amendment of Summons' 'jurisdiction and Power Under S 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996' 'strike Out Application' 'costs Reserved']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Supplementary Interlocutory Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the earlier interlocutory orders should be clarified to grant the applicants leave to amend the summons in the form attached to their notice of motion filed 4 November 2004.' "Whether the respondents' jurisdiction and power arguments concerning the proposed amended summons precluded leave to amend."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court clarified what was implicit in the earlier judgment by granting the applicants leave to amend the summons in the form attached to their notice of motion filed 4 November 2004, while otherwise leaving the earlier interlocutory orders unchanged because jurisdiction and power arguments could still be raised later if appropriate.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to amend; costs reserved; liberty to apply with respect to costs.
Orders
- ["Leave is granted to the applicants to amend the proceedings in the form of the amended summons, the subject of the applicants' notice of motion filed on 4 November 2004." 'Costs are reserved.' 'Liberty to apply with respect to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment