Brentwood Village Limited (in liq) v Terrigal Grosvenor Lodge Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1203

Brentwood Village Limited (in liq) v Terrigal Grosvenor Lodge Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1203

On the evidence, the applicants established a good arguable case that assets were transferred in suspicious circumstances to related entities, and there was a real danger that any judgment would not be satisfied due to ongoing or prospective dissipation of assets; therefore, in the interests of justice, the Court exercised its power under r 7.33 to require verified disclosure and ancillary document production by affidavit from both defendants.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 November 2014
Procedural Posture
Application for Ancillary Orders / Interlocutory Application—orders for Production of Documents
Outcome
Application for ancillary orders granted.
Legal Topics
['ancillary Orders' 'freezing Orders' 'test for Good Arguable Case' 'voidable Transactions' 'disclosure of Assets']
['practice and Procedure' 'corporations Law' 'equity'] ['ancillary Orders' 'freezing Orders' 'test for Good Arguable Case' 'voidable Transactions' 'disclosure of Assets']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Ancillary Orders / Interlocutory Application—orders for Production of Documents

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether ancillary orders for verified production of documents should be made under r 7.33 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)' 'Whether applicants have a good arguable case under s 588FE of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and/or s 37A of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW)' 'Whether there is a real danger that judgment will go unsatisfied due to dissipation of assets']

Ratio Decidendi

On the evidence, the applicants established a good arguable case that assets were transferred in suspicious circumstances to related entities, and there was a real danger that any judgment would not be satisfied due to ongoing or prospective dissipation of assets; therefore, in the interests of justice, the Court exercised its power under r 7.33 to require verified disclosure and ancillary document production by affidavit from both defendants.

Court Disposition

Application for ancillary orders granted.

Orders

  • ['By specified date, first defendant to serve affidavit detailing worldwide assets (including value, encumbrances, interest), documents of transfers exceeding $50,000, audited/signed financial statements (FYs 2008-date), all bank statements (2007-date), prudential compliance and audit reports, documents evidencing...