Estee Lauder Pty Ltd v Drew [1999] FCA 642
Because the bankrupt's failure to appear when the sequestration order was made resulted from administrative oversight after his solicitor was instructed to oppose the petition, the application was unopposed, and the evidence showed assets substantially exceeding unsecured liabilities, the Court was satisfied that the sequestration order should be annulled.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application for Annulment of Sequestration Order / Ex Tempore Reasons for Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Bankruptcy annulled.
- Legal Topics
- ['annulment of Bankruptcy' 'sequestration Order' 'non Appearance Due to Solicitor Administrative Oversight' "trustee's Costs and Fees"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application for Annulment of Sequestration Order / Ex Tempore Reasons for Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sequestration order made on 25 March 1999 should be annulled.' 'Whether service of the application for annulment on the creditors of the bankrupt should be dispensed with.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the bankrupt's failure to appear when the sequestration order was made resulted from administrative oversight after his solicitor was instructed to oppose the petition, the application was unopposed, and the evidence showed assets substantially exceeding unsecured liabilities, the Court was satisfied that the sequestration order should be annulled.
Court Disposition
Bankruptcy annulled.
Orders
- ['Service of the application for annulment on the creditors of the bankrupt be dispensed with.' 'The bankruptcy of Justin Anthony Drew be annulled.' 'The bankrupt to pay costs and fees of the trustee in the sum of $1,344 within 28 days.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment