Leto v Coffey Projects (Australia) Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1896

Leto v Coffey Projects (Australia) Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1896

It was not unreasonable for Mr Leto to refrain from raising the present cause of action as a cross-claim in earlier proceedings because there was no contest between Plaintiff and Coffey, no inconsistency between judgments, facts and causes of action were sufficiently distinct, and neither fairness nor efficiency justify dismissal or stay of the present claim under Anshun estoppel.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 December 2015
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Interlocutory Hearing and Determination
Outcome
Notice of Motion dated 27 November 2014 dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['anshun Estoppel' 'confidentiality Agreement' 'application to Strike Out for Delay' 'security for Costs']
['equity' 'civil Procedure'] ['anshun Estoppel' 'confidentiality Agreement' 'application to Strike Out for Delay' 'security for Costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Interlocutory Hearing and Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the proceedings should be dismissed/stayed under Anshun estoppel' 'Whether delay justifies striking out claim' 'Whether security for costs should be ordered' 'Whether details of settlement should be disclosed despite confidentiality agreement']

Ratio Decidendi

It was not unreasonable for Mr Leto to refrain from raising the present cause of action as a cross-claim in earlier proceedings because there was no contest between Plaintiff and Coffey, no inconsistency between judgments, facts and causes of action were sufficiently distinct, and neither fairness nor efficiency justify dismissal or stay of the present claim under Anshun estoppel.

Court Disposition

Notice of Motion dated 27 November 2014 dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Order the Notice of Motion dated 27 November 2014 be dismissed with costs.']