REGINA v TORO-MARTINEZ [2000] NSWCCA 216

REGINA v TORO-MARTINEZ [2000] NSWCCA 216

The appeal against conviction was dismissed as no real question about Toro-Martinez's guilt was established following his guilty plea; the controlled operations certificate was valid despite the typographical error; the official conduct did not induce the accused or reach a standard of impropriety or illegality warranting exclusion; the sentence was manifestly inadequate having regard to sentencing guidelines and comparative cases, warranting an increase to six years imprisonment with a three-year non-parole period.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 June 2000
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal, Post Conviction and Post Sentencing
Outcome
Conviction appeal dismissed; Crown appeal allowed.
Legal Topics
['appeal After Guilty Plea' 'sentencing for Drug Importation' 'controlled Operations Certificates' 'exclusion of Evidence for Impropriety' 'double Jeopardy in Sentencing']
['criminal Law'] ['appeal After Guilty Plea' 'sentencing for Drug Importation' 'controlled Operations Certificates' 'exclusion of Evidence for Impropriety' 'double Jeopardy in Sentencing']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal, Post Conviction and Post Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether a conviction after a guilty plea may be appealed in absence of a real question about guilt' 'Validity of controlled operations certificate under s15M of Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) despite typographical error' 'Whether police involvement in importation constituted illegality or impropriety warranting exclusion of evidence' 'Manifest inadequacy of sentence for drug importation']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal against conviction was dismissed as no real question about Toro-Martinez's guilt was established following his guilty plea; the controlled operations certificate was valid despite the typographical error; the official conduct did not induce the accused or reach a standard of impropriety or illegality warranting exclusion; the sentence was manifestly inadequate having regard to sentencing guidelines and comparative cases, warranting an increase to six years imprisonment with a three-year non-parole period.

Court Disposition

Conviction appeal dismissed; Crown appeal allowed.

Orders

  • ['Appeal against conviction dismissed.' 'Sentence imposed by trial judge quashed.' 'The respondent to the Crown appeal (Toro-Martinez) sentenced to six years imprisonment commencing 9 June 1998 and expiring 9 June 2004.' 'A non-parole period of three years imposed; eligible for parole on 8 June 2001.' 'Toro-Martinez...