R v Kurtulmus (No. 2) [2020] NSWDC 163
The Court refused release because it was not satisfied that special or exceptional circumstances existed to warrant bail, and was not persuaded that the appeal, if leave were granted, was most likely to succeed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Release Application Pending Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Release to Bail Pending Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal in the Court of Criminal Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for release is refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'application for Leave to Appeal' 'release Application' 'special or Exceptional Circumstances']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Release Application Pending Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Release to Bail Pending Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal in the Court of Criminal Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant should be released to bail pending determination of his application for leave to appeal against sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal.' 'Whether special or exceptional circumstances existed under s 22 Bail Act 2013 to justify granting bail.' 'Whether the proposed appeal was most likely to succeed.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court refused release because it was not satisfied that special or exceptional circumstances existed to warrant bail, and was not persuaded that the appeal, if leave were granted, was most likely to succeed.
Court Disposition
Application for release is refused.
Orders
- ['I refuse the application for release.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment