GIBBS & ANOR v MOUSSA & ANOR [2003] NSWSC 1208
Because the proceedings were referred for trial before the Master under par 4 Pt 3 of Schedule D of the Rules of the Supreme Court, Pt 60 r 17 required any appeal from the Master's judgment to be brought in the Court of Appeal; no appeal lay to a judge of the Supreme Court, so the appeal was dismissed with costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 December 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Master / Appeal Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs; Costs of the appeal to be assessed on an indemnity basis
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal From Master' 'jurisdiction of Single Judge' 'appeal to Court of Appeal' 'indemnity Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Master / Appeal Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether an appeal lay to a judge of the Supreme Court from Master Malpass's judgment in proceedings referred for trial under par 4 Pt 3 of Schedule D of the Rules of the Supreme Court." 'Whether the appeal should be dismissed with costs assessed on an indemnity basis.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the proceedings were referred for trial before the Master under par 4 Pt 3 of Schedule D of the Rules of the Supreme Court, Pt 60 r 17 required any appeal from the Master's judgment to be brought in the Court of Appeal; no appeal lay to a judge of the Supreme Court, so the appeal was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs; Costs of the appeal to be assessed on an indemnity basis
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed with costs.' 'Costs of the appeal to be assessed on an indemnity basis.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment