GIBBS & ANOR v MOUSSA & ANOR [2003] NSWSC 1208

GIBBS & ANOR v MOUSSA & ANOR [2003] NSWSC 1208

Because the proceedings were referred for trial before the Master under par 4 Pt 3 of Schedule D of the Rules of the Supreme Court, Pt 60 r 17 required any appeal from the Master's judgment to be brought in the Court of Appeal; no appeal lay to a judge of the Supreme Court, so the appeal was dismissed with costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 December 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Master / Appeal Hearing
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs; Costs of the appeal to be assessed on an indemnity basis
Legal Topics
['appeal From Master' 'jurisdiction of Single Judge' 'appeal to Court of Appeal' 'indemnity Costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Master / Appeal Hearing

  1. 1 ["Whether an appeal lay to a judge of the Supreme Court from Master Malpass's judgment in proceedings referred for trial under par 4 Pt 3 of Schedule D of the Rules of the Supreme Court." 'Whether the appeal should be dismissed with costs assessed on an indemnity basis.']

Ratio Decidendi

Because the proceedings were referred for trial before the Master under par 4 Pt 3 of Schedule D of the Rules of the Supreme Court, Pt 60 r 17 required any appeal from the Master's judgment to be brought in the Court of Appeal; no appeal lay to a judge of the Supreme Court, so the appeal was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs; Costs of the appeal to be assessed on an indemnity basis

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed with costs.' 'Costs of the appeal to be assessed on an indemnity basis.']