Gill & Anor v Residential Tribunal & Ors [2001] NSWSC 896
Because the proceedings arose under the Residential Tribunal Act 1998 and had been referred to a Master under Supreme Court Rules Schedule D Pt 3 para 5, Pt 60 rr 10 and 17 precluded an appeal to a single Judge and allowed only an appeal to the Court of Appeal with leave. Section 118(3) of the Supreme Court Act 1970 did not create an independent or additional appeal right. The purported appeal to a Judge was therefore incompetent.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Residential Tribunal; Purported Appeal From Decision of a Master / Determination of Whether There Was a Right of Appeal From the Master's Decision to the Court Constituted by a Judge
- Outcome
- Appeal incompetent; Notice of Motion filed 9 August 2001 dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal From Residential Tribunal' 'reference to Master' 'appeal From Master' 'jurisdiction of Single Judge' 'supreme Court Rules Pt 60']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Residential Tribunal; Purported Appeal From Decision of a Master / Determination of Whether There Was a Right of Appeal From the Master's Decision to the Court Constituted by a Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether an appeal lies to the Court constituted by a Judge from a Master's decision in proceedings referred under Supreme Court Rules Schedule D Pt 3 para 5 arising under the Residential Tribunal Act 1998 or Residential Tenancies Act 1987." 'Whether s 118(3) of the Supreme Court Act 1970 provides an independent right of appeal from a Master to a Judge notwithstanding Supreme Court Rules Pt 60 rr 10 and 17.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the proceedings arose under the Residential Tribunal Act 1998 and had been referred to a Master under Supreme Court Rules Schedule D Pt 3 para 5, Pt 60 rr 10 and 17 precluded an appeal to a single Judge and allowed only an appeal to the Court of Appeal with leave. Section 118(3) of the Supreme Court Act 1970 did not create an independent or additional appeal right. The purported appeal to a Judge was therefore incompetent.
Court Disposition
Appeal incompetent; Notice of Motion filed 9 August 2001 dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Appeal incompetent.' 'Notice of Motion filed 9 August 2001 dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment