BDA16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 85
The Federal Court lacks appellate jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from the FCCA's refusal to extend time under s 477(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) because of the jurisdictional bar imposed by s 476A(3)(a), so the notice of objection to competency was upheld and the application dismissed.
- Parties
- First Applicant: BDA16; Second Applicant: BDB16; Third Applicant: BDC16; Fourth Applicant: BDD16; Fifth Applicant: BPJ16; First Respondent: Minister for Home Affairs; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal—federal Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; notice of objection to competency upheld; applicants to pay first respondent's costs.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Jurisdiction, Extension of Time, Procedural Fairness, Tribunal Review, Jurisdictional Bar
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BDA16
First Applicant
BDB16
Second Applicant
BDC16
Third Applicant
BDD16
Fourth Applicant
BPJ16
Fifth Applicant
Minister for Home Affairs
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal—federal Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear an appeal against an FCCA refusal to extend time under s 477(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) due to s 476A(3)(a)
- 2 Whether applicants provided satisfactory explanation for delay in seeking judicial review
- 3 Whether the FCCA erred in findings regarding procedural fairness, credibility, and merits
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Court lacks appellate jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from the FCCA's refusal to extend time under s 477(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) because of the jurisdictional bar imposed by s 476A(3)(a), so the notice of objection to competency was upheld and the application dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; notice of objection to competency upheld; applicants to pay first respondent's costs.
Orders
- The notice of objection to competency be upheld.
- The application for leave to appeal dated 13 September 2018 be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment