Stone v Cleanaway Pty Ltd t/as Cleanaway; PTH Pty Ltd v Cleanaway Pty Ltd & Mahoney; Central West Auto Auctions Pty Ltd v Cleanaway Pty Ltd & Mahoney [2023] NSWSC 156

Stone v Cleanaway Pty Ltd t/as Cleanaway; PTH Pty Ltd v Cleanaway Pty Ltd & Mahoney; Central West Auto Auctions Pty Ltd v Cleanaway Pty Ltd & Mahoney [2023] NSWSC 156

The appeal was dismissed as the learned Magistrate's findings—that Mr Stone was negligent and Mr Mahoney was not—were supported by the evidence, in particular the CCTV footage and Mr Swanson's account. No error of law was established; although more fulsome reasons could have been given, the reasons were adequate and disclosed the basis for the judgment. The so-called 'agony of the moment' is not an independent principle but an application of the general negligence test. Reliance on contemporaneous CCTV evidence was justified.

Parties
First Plaintiff: David Anthony Stone; Second Plaintiff: PTH Pty Ltd; Third Plaintiff: Central West Auto Auctions Pty Ltd; First Defendant: Cleanaway Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Alfred Mahoney
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 March 2023
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Local Court Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Appeals, Negligence, Duty of Care, Adequacy of Reasons, Use of CCTV Evidence, Motor Vehicle Accident
Tort Law Civil Procedure Appeals Negligence Duty of Care Adequacy of Reasons Use of CCTV Evidence Motor Vehicle Accident

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Anthony Stone

First Plaintiff

PTH Pty Ltd

Second Plaintiff

Central West Auto Auctions Pty Ltd

Third Plaintiff

Cleanaway Pty Ltd

First Defendant

Alfred Mahoney

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Local Court Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Local Court judgment was affected by errors of law, specifically failure to consider relevant evidence, failure to give adequate reasons, and failure to properly apply legal principles including use of CCTV evidence and the 'agony of the moment'.
  2. 2 Whether the Magistrate erred in findings regarding negligence of the drivers.

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed as the learned Magistrate's findings—that Mr Stone was negligent and Mr Mahoney was not—were supported by the evidence, in particular the CCTV footage and Mr Swanson's account. No error of law was established; although more fulsome reasons could have been given, the reasons were adequate and disclosed the basis for the judgment. The so-called 'agony of the moment' is not an independent principle but an application of the general negligence test. Reliance on contemporaneous CCTV evidence was justified.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • The time for filing the summons commencing the appeal is extended.
  • The time for filing the summons seeking leave to appeal is extended.