GOVERNMENT INSURANCE OFFICE OF NEW SOUTH WALES v MULVENA [1993] NSWCA 117
The Court will not decide at this stage whether leave to appeal should be granted or whether such an appeal lies; even assuming it does, the application is premature and proceedings in the District Court should continue to judgment before appellate intervention is considered.
- Parties
- Opponent: Government Insurance Office of New South Wales; Claimant: Mulvena
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From District Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Summons for leave to appeal dismissed as premature.
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Leave to Appeal, Reopening of Evidence, Prematurity of Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Government Insurance Office of New South Wales
Opponent
Mulvena
Claimant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From District Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the District Court on remitter is confined to evidence earlier received
- 2 Whether the judge’s decision to permit reopening of evidence is within power
- 3 Whether appeal against the decision lies to the Court of Appeal by leave or otherwise
Ratio Decidendi
The Court will not decide at this stage whether leave to appeal should be granted or whether such an appeal lies; even assuming it does, the application is premature and proceedings in the District Court should continue to judgment before appellate intervention is considered.
Court Disposition
Summons for leave to appeal dismissed as premature.
Orders
- Summons for leave to appeal dismissed
- Claimant to pay the opponent's costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment