Foster v Que Noy [2008] FCAFC 56
The trial judge did not err in finding that the decision to remove Ms Foster as applicant and authorise her replacement was made in accordance with the Kamu people's traditional decision making process, as supported by unchallenged expert evidence. Ms Foster's absence and lack of notice regarding the purpose of the meeting did not invalidate the process. Appeals should therefore be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Full Court of the Federal Court on Appeal From a Single Judge
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['applicant Replacement in Native Title Claims' 'authorisation of Native Title Claim Group Decisions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Full Court of the Federal Court on Appeal From a Single Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the application to replace the applicant in the native title claim was validly authorised according to the traditional law and custom of the native title claim group']
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge did not err in finding that the decision to remove Ms Foster as applicant and authorise her replacement was made in accordance with the Kamu people's traditional decision making process, as supported by unchallenged expert evidence. Ms Foster's absence and lack of notice regarding the purpose of the meeting did not invalidate the process. Appeals should therefore be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeals dismissed' "Appellant to pay the respondents' costs of the appeal"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment