Lee v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 354
The application was dismissed under Order 35A rule 3(1)(a) of the Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) because the applicants failed to prosecute their application with due diligence, did not appear at the hearing, and provided no satisfactory explanation for prior non-appearance; even if explanation provided, no merit in underlying review application.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['application for Leave to Appeal' 'dismissal for Non Prosecution' 'extension of Time' 'transitional (temporary) (class Ua) Visas']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted despite late application' 'Whether explanation for non-appearance at prior hearing was satisfactory' 'Whether merits exist to set aside dismissal for absence' 'Whether the failure to prosecute application with due diligence warrants dismissal']
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed under Order 35A rule 3(1)(a) of the Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) because the applicants failed to prosecute their application with due diligence, did not appear at the hearing, and provided no satisfactory explanation for prior non-appearance; even if explanation provided, no merit in underlying review application.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The name of the first respondent be amended to Minister for Immigration and Citizenship.' 'The application be dismissed.' "Hea Ran Lee, the first-named applicant, pay the first respondent's costs of the application." 'The costs specified in the immediately preceding order be fixed in a sum of $600.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment