Kemppi v State of Queensland [2017] FCA 902
The application for leave to appeal was refused because none of the grounds raised sufficient doubt as to the correctness of the primary judge's decision. The notice for the March 2016 meeting did not satisfy requirements for reasonable notice and opportunity, and several discretionary considerations overwhelmingly weighed against making orders under s 66B.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Delia Kemppi; Second Applicant: Lester Barnard; Third Applicant: Gary Saltner Fisher; Fourth Applicant: Alexandra Gater; Fifth Applicant: Lyndell Turbane; Sixth Applicant: Adrian Burragubba; Seventh Applicant: Linda Bobongie; Eighth Applicant: Murrawah Johnson; Ninth Applicant: Billie-Anne Broome; First Respondent: State of Queensland; Second Respondent: Adrian Burragubba & Ors on behalf of the Wangan and Jagalingou People; Third Respondent: Commonwealth of Australia; Fourth Respondent: Barcaldine Regional Council; Fifth Respondent: Central Highlands Regional Council; Sixth Respondent: Isaac Regional Council; Seventh Respondent: Ergon Energy Corporation Limited; Eighth Respondent: Telstra Corporation Limited; Ninth Respondent: Alpha Coal Pty Ltd; Tenth Respondent: Australia Pacific LNG Pty Limited; Eleventh Respondent: Bisam Pty Limited; Twelfth Respondent: Blair Athol Coal Pty Limited; Thirteenth Respondent: Clyde Ian Doxford; Fourteenth Respondent: Hancock Coal Pty Ltd; Fifteenth Respondent: Hancock Galilee Pty Ltd; Sixteenth Respondent: Hancock Kevin's Corner Pty Ltd; Seventeenth Respondent: Queensland Coal Pty Limited; Eighteenth Respondent: Peter Shevill; Nineteenth Respondent: Vale Coal Exploration Pty Ltd; Twentieth Respondent: Bellevue Pastoral Pty Ltd; Twenty First Respondent: Evan Benney; Twenty Second Respondent: Margaret Catherine Bird; Twenty Third Respondent: Peter John Baird; Twenty Fourth Respondent: Chudleigh Farm Pty Ltd; Twenty Fifth Respondent: Bruce Raymond Cobb; Twenty Sixth Respondent: Samantha Elizabeth Cobb; Twenty Seventh Respondent: Creek Farm Pty Ltd; Twenty Eighth Respondent: Allison Glenda Finger; Twenty Ninth Respondent: Steven William Finger; Thirtieth Respondent: Sharon Maree Fraser; Thirty First Respondent: Simon Munro Fraser; Thirty Second Respondent: Trevor David Goodwin; Thirty Third Respondent: Johnson Management (Qld) Pty Ltd t/as BECO Pastoral Trust; Thirty Fourth Respondent: Logan Creek Pty Ltd; Thirty Fifth Respondent: Mexico Grazing Co Pty Ltd; Thirty Sixth Respondent: Raye Marilyn O'Sullivan; Thirty Seventh Respondent: Robert Alan O'Sullivan; Thirty Eighth Respondent: Pretty Plains Pty Ltd; Thirty Ninth Respondent: Joanne Mary Salmond; Fortieth Respondent: Josephine Barbara Salmond; Forty First Respondent: Geoffrey Thomas Scharf; Forty Second Respondent: Patrick John Scharf; Forty Third Respondent: Teresa Monica Scharf; Forty Fourth Respondent: David Albert Scott; Forty Fifth Respondent: Sedgeford Pastoral Company Pty Ltd; Forty Sixth Respondent: Ainslie Bruce McKenzie Templeton; First Intervener: Priscilla Gyemore; Second Intervener: Irene Simpson; Third Intervener: Les Tilley; Fourth Intervener: Patrick Malone; Fifth Intervener: Norman Johnson (Jnr); Sixth Intervener: Gwendoline Fisher
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Hearing and Determination of Leave Application
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Application for Leave to Appeal, Notice of Meeting Requirements, Discretion Under S 66 B of the Native Title Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Delia Kemppi
First Applicant
Lester Barnard
Second Applicant
Gary Saltner Fisher
Third Applicant
Alexandra Gater
Fourth Applicant
Lyndell Turbane
Fifth Applicant
Adrian Burragubba
Sixth Applicant
Linda Bobongie
Seventh Applicant
Murrawah Johnson
Eighth Applicant
Billie-Anne Broome
Ninth Applicant
State of Queensland
First Respondent
Adrian Burragubba & Ors on behalf of the Wangan and Jagalingou People
Second Respondent
Commonwealth of Australia
Third Respondent
Barcaldine Regional Council
Fourth Respondent
Central Highlands Regional Council
Fifth Respondent
Isaac Regional Council
Sixth Respondent
Ergon Energy Corporation Limited
Seventh Respondent
Telstra Corporation Limited
Eighth Respondent
Alpha Coal Pty Ltd
Ninth Respondent
Australia Pacific LNG Pty Limited
Tenth Respondent
Bisam Pty Limited
Eleventh Respondent
Blair Athol Coal Pty Limited
Twelfth Respondent
Clyde Ian Doxford
Thirteenth Respondent
Hancock Coal Pty Ltd
Fourteenth Respondent
Hancock Galilee Pty Ltd
Fifteenth Respondent
Hancock Kevin's Corner Pty Ltd
Sixteenth Respondent
Queensland Coal Pty Limited
Seventeenth Respondent
Peter Shevill
Eighteenth Respondent
Vale Coal Exploration Pty Ltd
Nineteenth Respondent
Bellevue Pastoral Pty Ltd
Twentieth Respondent
Evan Benney
Twenty First Respondent
Margaret Catherine Bird
Twenty Second Respondent
Peter John Baird
Twenty Third Respondent
Chudleigh Farm Pty Ltd
Twenty Fourth Respondent
Bruce Raymond Cobb
Twenty Fifth Respondent
Samantha Elizabeth Cobb
Twenty Sixth Respondent
Creek Farm Pty Ltd
Twenty Seventh Respondent
Allison Glenda Finger
Twenty Eighth Respondent
Steven William Finger
Twenty Ninth Respondent
Sharon Maree Fraser
Thirtieth Respondent
Simon Munro Fraser
Thirty First Respondent
Trevor David Goodwin
Thirty Second Respondent
Johnson Management (Qld) Pty Ltd t/as BECO Pastoral Trust
Thirty Third Respondent
Logan Creek Pty Ltd
Thirty Fourth Respondent
Mexico Grazing Co Pty Ltd
Thirty Fifth Respondent
Raye Marilyn O'Sullivan
Thirty Sixth Respondent
Robert Alan O'Sullivan
Thirty Seventh Respondent
Pretty Plains Pty Ltd
Thirty Eighth Respondent
Joanne Mary Salmond
Thirty Ninth Respondent
Josephine Barbara Salmond
Fortieth Respondent
Geoffrey Thomas Scharf
Forty First Respondent
Patrick John Scharf
Forty Second Respondent
Teresa Monica Scharf
Forty Third Respondent
David Albert Scott
Forty Fourth Respondent
Sedgeford Pastoral Company Pty Ltd
Forty Fifth Respondent
Ainslie Bruce McKenzie Templeton
Forty Sixth Respondent
Priscilla Gyemore
First Intervener
Irene Simpson
Second Intervener
Les Tilley
Third Intervener
Patrick Malone
Fourth Intervener
Norman Johnson (Jnr)
Fifth Intervener
Gwendoline Fisher
Sixth Intervener
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Hearing and Determination of Leave Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether decision of primary judge attended by sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration
- 2 Whether applicant would suffer substantial injustice if leave to appeal were refused
- 3 Adequacy and validity of notice for March 2016 meeting under Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) s 66B
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal was refused because none of the grounds raised sufficient doubt as to the correctness of the primary judge's decision. The notice for the March 2016 meeting did not satisfy requirements for reasonable notice and opportunity, and several discretionary considerations overwhelmingly weighed against making orders under s 66B.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Orders
- The amended application for leave to appeal filed 9 May 2017 be dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment