Alexander v Moss [1999] NSWCA 64
The order to strike out the claimant's action was inappropriate because at the time of the order, the claimant was not in default of any procedural requirements and the opponent was in default. Therefore, the striking out of the action was wrongly made and should be set aside.
- Parties
- Claimant: Geoffrey Tyler Alexander; Opponent: Darren Moss
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Leave Application
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal to be allowed and orders below set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Application for Leave to Appeal, Strike Out of Proceeding, District Court Practice, Non Compliance With Court Directions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Geoffrey Tyler Alexander
Claimant
Darren Moss
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Leave Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the District Court erred in striking out the claimant's action for alleged procedural default
- 2 Whether the claimant was in default at the time the action was struck out
- 3 Whether the opponent's own default affected the appropriateness of the strike out
Ratio Decidendi
The order to strike out the claimant's action was inappropriate because at the time of the order, the claimant was not in default of any procedural requirements and the opponent was in default. Therefore, the striking out of the action was wrongly made and should be set aside.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal to be allowed and orders below set aside.
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted
- Appeal allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment