AFT Pharmaceuticals (AU) Pty Ltd v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 1092
The Court determined there was no misapprehension of the facts or manner in which the applicant's argument was advanced, and the admission of representations was not qualified as claimed; accordingly, the application to re-open was refused with costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Re Open Proceedings / Post Judgment, Pre Publication of Judgment
- Outcome
- Application to re-open refused with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['application to Re Open After Judgment' 'misapprehension of Facts' 'misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'adequate Scientific Foundation' 'finality of Litigation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Re Open Proceedings / Post Judgment, Pre Publication of Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court misapprehended the facts or manner of argument advanced by the applicant' 'Whether leave should be granted to re-open the matter after judgment but before publication']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court determined there was no misapprehension of the facts or manner in which the applicant's argument was advanced, and the admission of representations was not qualified as claimed; accordingly, the application to re-open was refused with costs.
Court Disposition
Application to re-open refused with costs.
Orders
- ["The applicant's application for leave to re-open is refused with costs." 'The time for compliance with order 2 of the orders made on 21 May 2020 be extended to 18 August 2020.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment