Pi v Zhou [2015] NSWSC 470
Default judgment was irregularly entered as the defendants' defence was filed prior to the default judgment, and there is a real issue to be tried on the merits; therefore, justice requires the default judgment be set aside.
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Guang Hua Pi; First Defendant/applicant: Jian Cheng Zhou; Second Defendant/applicant: Christine Zhou
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application to Set Aside Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Application to set aside default judgment granted.
- Legal Topics
- Application to Set Aside Default Judgment, Arguable Defence, Filing of Defence Before Default Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Guang Hua Pi
Plaintiff/respondent
Jian Cheng Zhou
First Defendant/applicant
Christine Zhou
Second Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application to Set Aside Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether default judgment should be set aside when defence was filed before its entry
- 2 Whether an arguable defence exists in response to claims of assault and defamation
Ratio Decidendi
Default judgment was irregularly entered as the defendants' defence was filed prior to the default judgment, and there is a real issue to be tried on the merits; therefore, justice requires the default judgment be set aside.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside default judgment granted.
Orders
- Order 1 in the notice of motion granted: Default judgment in favour of the plaintiff dated 16 July 2014 is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment