Arumainathan, in the matter of STJC Pty Ltd v STJC Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1229
Given the breakdown of the relationship between unit holders and evidence of inability to properly manage the Trust's affairs, the appointment of a receiver was necessary to protect the assets of the Trust. Appointment of a liquidator was not appropriate as it could trigger the termination of the business lease, causing detriment to the business.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Receiver appointed; application to appoint liquidator dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['appointment of Receiver' 'appointment of Liquidator' 'breakdown in Trust Management' 'unit Trust']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a receiver should be appointed to the assets of the STJC Unit Trust' 'Whether a liquidator should be appointed to STJC Pty Ltd']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the breakdown of the relationship between unit holders and evidence of inability to properly manage the Trust's affairs, the appointment of a receiver was necessary to protect the assets of the Trust. Appointment of a liquidator was not appropriate as it could trigger the termination of the business lease, causing detriment to the business.
Court Disposition
Receiver appointed; application to appoint liquidator dismissed.
Orders
- ['Timothy James Cook appointed as receiver over all assets and undertaking of the STJC Unit Trust.' 'Receiver to have powers under s 420 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) with certain exceptions.' 'Receiver to be remunerated at rates per consent filed.' 'Costs, expenses, and remuneration of Receiver payable from...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment