Ozmen Entertainment Pty Ltd v Neptune Hospitality Pty Ltd (No 3) [2018] FCA 1411
Given the breakdown in relations between the joint venturers, the persistent and unresolved disputes, failure to maintain transparent accounts, and the parties’ inability to cooperate even under court order, the interests of justice warranted the appointment of a receiver and manager to take control of the business and vessel pending final determination. Interlocutory orders for payment of profits or shared costs were refused as the underlying accounting and legal disputes should await final hearing. Security for costs was ordered in an amount reflecting future costs, not to be met from funds held in trust, because plaintiffs’ assets were insufficient and in dispute.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff and First Cross Respondent: Ozmen Entertainment Pty Ltd; Second Plaintiff and Second Cross Respondent: Kanki Sea Tourism Hospitality & Entertainment Pty Ltd; Defendant and Cross Claimant: Neptune Hospitality Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application in Ongoing Proceedings / Interlocutory (orders and Reasons on Receivership, Payment of Profits, Shared Costs, and Security for Costs)
- Outcome
- Application for appointment of receiver and manager granted; interlocutory payment of profits and shared costs refused; security for costs ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Receiver, Security for Costs, Joint Venture Dispute, Payments of Profits, Management of Joint Venture Assets
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ozmen Entertainment Pty Ltd
First Plaintiff and First Cross Respondent
Kanki Sea Tourism Hospitality & Entertainment Pty Ltd
Second Plaintiff and Second Cross Respondent
Neptune Hospitality Pty Ltd
Defendant and Cross Claimant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application in Ongoing Proceedings / Interlocutory (orders and Reasons on Receivership, Payment of Profits, Shared Costs, and Security for Costs)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to appoint a receiver and manager to the business and vessel pending final determination
- 2 Whether to order interlocutory payment of profits under the joint venture agreement
- 3 Whether to order interlocutory repayment of shared costs under the joint venture agreement
Ratio Decidendi
Given the breakdown in relations between the joint venturers, the persistent and unresolved disputes, failure to maintain transparent accounts, and the parties’ inability to cooperate even under court order, the interests of justice warranted the appointment of a receiver and manager to take control of the business and vessel pending final determination. Interlocutory orders for payment of profits or shared costs were refused as the underlying accounting and legal disputes should await final hearing. Security for costs was ordered in an amount reflecting future costs, not to be met from funds held in trust, because plaintiffs’ assets were insufficient and in dispute.
Court Disposition
Application for appointment of receiver and manager granted; interlocutory payment of profits and shared costs refused; security for costs ordered.
Orders
- Plaintiffs to provide security for defendant’s costs in the amount of $123,750 prior to 4 October 2018.
- In default of security, proceedings against the defendant stayed until further order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment