Hamilton (Liquidator), in the matter of Greenleaf (Tas) Pty Ltd (in liq) [2023] FCA 1380
Because Greenleaf (Tas) Pty Ltd had conducted only the Trust business, ceased to be trustee on the appointment of administrators and thereafter held Trust assets as bare trustee, and because the liquidators required authority to realise and sell the Trust assets for the benefit of creditors, it was just and convenient under s 57 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) to appoint the plaintiffs jointly and severally as receivers of all Trust assets and to make the ancillary orders sought, including orders as to powers, costs, expenses, remuneration, and dispensing with security and guarantee requirements.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application by Liquidators of a Former Corporate Trustee Under S 57 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (cth) for Appointment as Receivers of Trust Property and Ancillary Orders / Originating Process Heard; Orders Made on 2 November 2023
- Outcome
- Application granted; plaintiffs appointed jointly and severally, without security, as receivers of all assets of the Winwood Family Trust and ancillary orders made.
- Legal Topics
- ['appointment of Receivers' 'liquidator of Former Corporate Trustee' 'trading Trust Assets' 'bare Trustee' 'right of Indemnity and Equitable Lien' 'sale of Trust Property' 'receiver Security and Guarantee']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application by Liquidators of a Former Corporate Trustee Under S 57 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (cth) for Appointment as Receivers of Trust Property and Ancillary Orders / Originating Process Heard; Orders Made on 2 November 2023
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the liquidators of Greenleaf (Tas) Pty Ltd, which had ceased to be trustee of the Winwood Family Trust upon the appointment of administrators, should be appointed jointly and severally as receivers of all assets of the Trust.' 'Whether ancillary orders should be made enabling the plaintiffs to realise and sell the Trust assets and have costs, expenses and remuneration paid from Trust assets.' 'Whether the plaintiffs should be appointed without security and without filing a guarantee under rr 14.21 and 14.22 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).']
Ratio Decidendi
Because Greenleaf (Tas) Pty Ltd had conducted only the Trust business, ceased to be trustee on the appointment of administrators and thereafter held Trust assets as bare trustee, and because the liquidators required authority to realise and sell the Trust assets for the benefit of creditors, it was just and convenient under s 57 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) to appoint the plaintiffs jointly and severally as receivers of all Trust assets and to make the ancillary orders sought, including orders as to powers, costs, expenses, remuneration, and dispensing with security and guarantee requirements.
Court Disposition
Application granted; plaintiffs appointed jointly and severally, without security, as receivers of all assets of the Winwood Family Trust and ancillary orders made.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 57 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), the plaintiffs, Barry Kenneth Hamilton and Kiara Melaleuca Calvert, be appointed jointly and severally, without security, as the receivers of all the assets of the Winwood Family Trust.' 'In respect of the assets of the Trust, the plaintiffs have,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment