Warner v Wong, in the matter of Bellpac Pty Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (In Liq) (No 6) [2015] FCA 1175
Given multiple defendants with varying degrees of involvement and discontinuance against some, it is appropriate to apportion costs pursuant to s 43(3)(c) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976, reflecting each party's involvement. The plaintiffs succeeded in showing they are the true owners of the relevant bonds, entitling them to delivery up, rectification of registers, and costs orders as apportioned.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Anthony John Warner and Steven Kugel in their capacities as joint and several liquidators of Bellpac Pty Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (In Liquidation) ACN 101 713 017; Second Plaintiff: Bellpac Pty Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (In Liquidation) ACN 101 713 017; Third Defendant: Alfred Wong; Fifth Defendant: Shan Pei Investment Limited; Sixth Defendant: Good Team Investments Limited; Seventh Defendant: Great Investments Limited; Eighth Defendant: Osmond Tze Leung Kwok; Ninth Defendant: Hong Xu; Tenth Defendant: Zhi Hong; Eleventh Defendant: Chiah Cheang Lee; Twelfth Defendant: Gujarat NRE Coking Coal Limited (formerly known as Gujarat NRE Minerals Limited); Thirteenth Defendant: All Seasons Resources Inc; Fourteenth Defendant: View Plan Enterprises Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Proceedings / Post Trial (final Orders and Costs)
- Outcome
- Relief granted (declarations as to ownership, delivery up of bond certificates, rectification/cancellation/reissue of bonds, return of security for costs), costs apportioned among defendants as specified.
- Legal Topics
- Apportionment of Costs, Ownership of Convertible Bonds, Rectification of Register, Security for Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony John Warner and Steven Kugel in their capacities as joint and several liquidators of Bellpac Pty Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (In Liquidation) ACN 101 713 017
First Plaintiff
Bellpac Pty Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (In Liquidation) ACN 101 713 017
Second Plaintiff
Alfred Wong
Third Defendant
Shan Pei Investment Limited
Fifth Defendant
Good Team Investments Limited
Sixth Defendant
Great Investments Limited
Seventh Defendant
Osmond Tze Leung Kwok
Eighth Defendant
Hong Xu
Ninth Defendant
Zhi Hong
Tenth Defendant
Chiah Cheang Lee
Eleventh Defendant
Gujarat NRE Coking Coal Limited (formerly known as Gujarat NRE Minerals Limited)
Twelfth Defendant
All Seasons Resources Inc
Thirteenth Defendant
View Plan Enterprises Limited
Fourteenth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Proceedings / Post Trial (final Orders and Costs)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs are the true owners of 8% convertible bonds issued by the twelfth defendant and held by other defendants
- 2 Whether orders should be made for delivery up and rectification of records regarding such bonds
- 3 How costs should be apportioned among defendants given varying levels of involvement
Ratio Decidendi
Given multiple defendants with varying degrees of involvement and discontinuance against some, it is appropriate to apportion costs pursuant to s 43(3)(c) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976, reflecting each party's involvement. The plaintiffs succeeded in showing they are the true owners of the relevant bonds, entitling them to delivery up, rectification of registers, and costs orders as apportioned.
Court Disposition
Relief granted (declarations as to ownership, delivery up of bond certificates, rectification/cancellation/reissue of bonds, return of security for costs), costs apportioned among defendants as specified.
Orders
- Declared the second plaintiff is true owner of specified bonds (Good Team, Great Investments, Kwok, Xu, and Lee Bonds).
- Relevant defendants (sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, and eleventh) ordered to deliver up bond certificates and related documents within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment