Brooks v The Upjohn Company [1998] FCA 929

Brooks v The Upjohn Company [1998] FCA 929

A fair-minded and properly informed observer, knowing the relevant facts and the expectations of judicial impartiality, would not reasonably apprehend that the judge might not bring an impartial and unprejudiced mind to the case, given the tenuous and indirect connection between the judge’s son and the solicitors, and the solicitors’ neutral role. Therefore, there was no reasonable apprehension of bias warranting disqualification.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 August 1998
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application/appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal From Interlocutory Orders
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted but appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['apprehended Bias' 'disqualification of Judge' 'appealability of Costs Orders' 'interlocutory Orders']
['practice and Procedure' 'judicial Bias'] ['apprehended Bias' 'disqualification of Judge' 'appealability of Costs Orders' 'interlocutory Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application/appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal From Interlocutory Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the refusal to disqualify a judge and accompanying costs order constitutes an appealable order' 'Whether there was a reasonable apprehension of bias requiring the judge to disqualify herself' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted in interlocutory bias decisions']

Ratio Decidendi

A fair-minded and properly informed observer, knowing the relevant facts and the expectations of judicial impartiality, would not reasonably apprehend that the judge might not bring an impartial and unprejudiced mind to the case, given the tenuous and indirect connection between the judge’s son and the solicitors, and the solicitors’ neutral role. Therefore, there was no reasonable apprehension of bias warranting disqualification.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted but appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ["Time for filing applicant's notice of motion extended." 'Applicant granted leave to appeal from orders of 25 February 1998 and 2 April 1998.' 'Appeal dismissed.' 'Liberty to file and serve submissions on costs granted to parties.']