Phoenix Institute of Australia Pty Ltd (in liq), in the matter of Phoenix Institute of Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) [2021] FCA 1203
The remuneration was approved because the SPLs' work was necessary to comply with the First and Second Funding Agreements and the Further Scope of Works, was properly performed, delegated to persons of suitable seniority, undertaken in a short timeframe in relatively complex circumstances involving substantial Commonwealth funding and impending limitation issues, and was proportionate notwithstanding that no recoveries resulted. Cessation of appointment was appropriate because the Initial and Further Scope of Works had been performed, the Second Funding Agreement had been terminated, no further funding was in place, and only confined administrative tasks remained before lodging ASIC...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 October 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Ss 60 10 and 90 15 of the Insolvency Practice Schedule (corporations) for Approval of Remuneration of Special Purpose Liquidators, Cessation of Appointment and Ancillary Orders / Originating Application; Final Orders
- Outcome
- Application successful; orders made substantially in the form sought by the special purpose liquidators.
- Legal Topics
- ['approval of External Administrator Remuneration' 'special Purpose Liquidators' 'cessation of Appointment of External Administrators' 'notice Requirements Under Federal Court (corporations) Rules 2000 (cth)' 'vet FEE HELP Funding Investigations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Ss 60 10 and 90 15 of the Insolvency Practice Schedule (corporations) for Approval of Remuneration of Special Purpose Liquidators, Cessation of Appointment and Ancillary Orders / Originating Application; Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the special purpose liquidators' remuneration for work performed from 28 May 2021 to the conclusion of their appointment was for necessary work properly performed and was fair and reasonable." 'Whether the special purpose liquidators should cease their appointment after completing remaining administrative tasks and lodging ASIC forms.' 'Whether the requirement under r 9.2(2) of the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth) to notify certain parties should be dispensed with to the extent not already complied with.']
Ratio Decidendi
The remuneration was approved because the SPLs' work was necessary to comply with the First and Second Funding Agreements and the Further Scope of Works, was properly performed, delegated to persons of suitable seniority, undertaken in a short timeframe in relatively complex circumstances involving substantial Commonwealth funding and impending limitation issues, and was proportionate notwithstanding that no recoveries resulted. Cessation of appointment was appropriate because the Initial and Further Scope of Works had been performed, the Second Funding Agreement had been terminated, no further funding was in place, and only confined administrative tasks remained before lodging ASIC...
Court Disposition
Application successful; orders made substantially in the form sought by the special purpose liquidators.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to section 60-10(1)(c) of the Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations) being Schedule 2 to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the second and third plaintiffs are entitled to receive remuneration of $89,930 excluding GST for work performed in the liquidation of Phoenix Institute of Australia Pty Ltd (in...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment