R v EDEN [2021] NSWDC 623
The offence was moderately below mid-range but involved substantial objective seriousness: the offender used a substantial knife, deliberately wounded the victim, threatened him, and stole a small amount after some planning. A very strong subjective case, including youth, limited criminal history, remorse, abstinence from drugs, rehabilitation, support, and significant Bugmy factors, reduced moral culpability and lowered the starting point, but the seriousness of armed robbery with wounding, the maximum penalty and standard non-parole period required full time imprisonment rather than an Intensive Correction Order. A 25% plea discount reduced the starting point of 5 years to a total...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing for Armed Robbery With Wounding Contrary to S 98 of the Crimes Act, 1900 / Plea of Guilty Adhered to at Sentence Hearing After Committal for Sentence From Wagga Wagga Local Court
- Outcome
- Offender convicted and sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2 years and a balance of term of 1 year 9 months.
- Legal Topics
- ['armed Robbery With Wounding' 'guilty Plea' 'guideline Judgment' 'bugmy Factors' 'youth and Rehabilitation' 'special Circumstances' 'intensive Correction Order' 'victim Impact Statement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Armed Robbery With Wounding Contrary to S 98 of the Crimes Act, 1900 / Plea of Guilty Adhered to at Sentence Hearing After Committal for Sentence From Wagga Wagga Local Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for armed robbery with wounding involving a knife and intentional wounding.' 'Where the objective seriousness of the offence fell relative to the range for offences of this type.' "What weight should be given to the offender's guilty plea, youth, limited criminal history, remorse, rehabilitation, and Bugmy factors." 'Whether a sentence capable of being served by Intensive Correction Order was appropriate.' 'Whether special circumstances justified a reduced non-parole period.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offence was moderately below mid-range but involved substantial objective seriousness: the offender used a substantial knife, deliberately wounded the victim, threatened him, and stole a small amount after some planning. A very strong subjective case, including youth, limited criminal history, remorse, abstinence from drugs, rehabilitation, support, and significant Bugmy factors, reduced moral culpability and lowered the starting point, but the seriousness of armed robbery with wounding, the maximum penalty and standard non-parole period required full time imprisonment rather than an Intensive Correction Order. A 25% plea discount reduced the starting point of 5 years to a total...
Court Disposition
Offender convicted and sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2 years and a balance of term of 1 year 9 months.
Orders
- ['In respect of the offence of Armed Robbery with Wounding to which the offender has pleaded guilty he is convicted.' 'The offender is sentenced to a non-parole period of 2 years to commence on 18 November 2021 and to expire on 17 November 2023.' 'Thereafter there will be a balance of term of 1 year 9 months to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment