(Re Ali Berro As Executor of the Estate of the late Ahmad Berro) Sate of New South Wales v Amaba Pty Ltd [2017] NSWDDT 15
The deceased was exposed to asbestos dust from Amaba's brake linings during his employment; Amaba owed and breached a duty of care by failing to provide adequate warnings despite knowledge of risk, and apportionment between the State and Amaba is to be 50/50.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Cross Claim / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Verdict for the Cross-Claimant on the Cross-Claim.
- Legal Topics
- ['asbestos Exposure' 'mesothelioma' 'breach of Duty' 'apportionment of Liability' 'contribution Between Tortfeasors']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Cross Claim / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Was the deceased exposed to asbestos dust from Amaba's products as a result of brake work conducted at the Eveleigh workshops during the course of his employment?" 'Was that exposure (if any) in breach of a duty of care owed by Amaba to the deceased?' 'What is the appropriate apportionment between the State and Amaba?']
Ratio Decidendi
The deceased was exposed to asbestos dust from Amaba's brake linings during his employment; Amaba owed and breached a duty of care by failing to provide adequate warnings despite knowledge of risk, and apportionment between the State and Amaba is to be 50/50.
Court Disposition
Verdict for the Cross-Claimant on the Cross-Claim.
Orders
- ['Verdict for the Cross-Claimant on the Cross-Claim.' 'Parties to bring in short minutes of order to give effect to the judgment.' 'Court will hear the parties on costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment