Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Sadrata (No 2) [2024] NFSC 3
The assaults were very serious domestic violence offences requiring sentences of imprisonment, but the offender's prior good character, early guilty pleas, genuine remorse, positive and effective rehabilitation, abstinence from alcohol, and very low risk of reoffending made it desirable to impose concurrent 15-month sentences and wholly suspend their execution for 15 months with rehabilitative conditions. The offences were domestic violence offences and a final apprehended violence order was appropriate despite the low risk of reoffending.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing for Four Counts of Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm Contrary to S 82(1) of the Criminal Code 2007 (ni) / Sentence After Guilty Pleas
- Outcome
- Offender convicted on four counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and sentenced to concurrent terms of 15 months' imprisonment, wholly suspended for 15 months with conditions; offences recorded as domestic violence offences; final apprehended violence order made for 24 months.
- Legal Topics
- ['assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm' 'suspended Sentence' 'comparable Sentencing Cases' 'domestic Violence Offence Recording' 'final Apprehended Violence Order']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Four Counts of Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm Contrary to S 82(1) of the Criminal Code 2007 (ni) / Sentence After Guilty Pleas
Legal Issues
- 1 ["What sentences should be imposed for four counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm committed against the offender's domestic partner." 'Whether comparable cases established a sentencing range or required actual imprisonment.' 'Whether it was desirable in all the circumstances to wholly suspend the sentences pursuant to s 39 of the Sentencing Act 2007 (NI).' 'Whether the offences should be recorded as domestic violence offences and whether a final apprehended violence order should be made under the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), as it applies in Norfolk Island.']
Ratio Decidendi
The assaults were very serious domestic violence offences requiring sentences of imprisonment, but the offender's prior good character, early guilty pleas, genuine remorse, positive and effective rehabilitation, abstinence from alcohol, and very low risk of reoffending made it desirable to impose concurrent 15-month sentences and wholly suspend their execution for 15 months with rehabilitative conditions. The offences were domestic violence offences and a final apprehended violence order was appropriate despite the low risk of reoffending.
Court Disposition
Offender convicted on four counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and sentenced to concurrent terms of 15 months' imprisonment, wholly suspended for 15 months with conditions; offences recorded as domestic violence offences; final apprehended violence order made for 24 months.
Orders
- ['The offender, Mr Emosi Sadrata, is convicted of the four (4) counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm contrary to section 82(1) of Criminal Code 2007 (NI) in the indictment dated 18 December 2023.' 'In respect of each of those offences, the offender, Mr Emosi Sadrata, is sentenced to a term of imprisonment...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment