R v Di Cola [1999] NSWCCA 195
The appeal was dismissed because the sentencing judge's doubts about the applicant's contrition were open on the ERISP and pre-sentence report, the judge was entitled to rely on the uncross-examined pre-sentence report, no error in the sentencing approach was shown, and the concurrent three-year sentences for serious offences involving breach of trust against a young child were within the appropriate range.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence in the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['assault With Act of Indecency' 'child Victim' 'breach of Trust' 'contrition' 'pre Sentence Report' 'special Circumstances' 'sentence Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence in the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the sentencing judge erred in his treatment of the applicant's evidence of contrition." "Whether the sentencing judge was entitled to rely on the pre-sentence report notwithstanding the applicant's complaint about its basis." 'Whether the sentence imposed was outside the appropriate range of the sentencing discretion.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the sentencing judge's doubts about the applicant's contrition were open on the ERISP and pre-sentence report, the judge was entitled to rely on the uncross-examined pre-sentence report, no error in the sentencing approach was shown, and the concurrent three-year sentences for serious offences involving breach of trust against a young child were within the appropriate range.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment