Lee v Yang [2006] NSWCA 214
An assessment of the amount of damages for liability under a claim is not binding on the insurer unless the insurer accepts the liability as found by the assessor, including the degree of contributory negligence; because in this case the insurer did not accept the assessed 10% contributory negligence, the damages assessment was not binding.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Leave to Appeal Granted and Appeal Allowed
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; orders below set aside; costs orders made.
- Legal Topics
- ['assessment of Damages' 'contributory Negligence' 'binding Effect of Assessment' 'statutory Interpretation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal Granted and Appeal Allowed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an assessment of damages under s 95(2) of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 is binding on the insurer when the insurer has not accepted the assessed liability, particularly the assessed percentage of contributory negligence.']
Ratio Decidendi
An assessment of the amount of damages for liability under a claim is not binding on the insurer unless the insurer accepts the liability as found by the assessor, including the degree of contributory negligence; because in this case the insurer did not accept the assessed 10% contributory negligence, the damages assessment was not binding.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; orders below set aside; costs orders made.
Orders
- ['Grant leave to appeal and direct the filing of the notice of appeal within seven days.' 'Appeal allowed.' "Set aside the orders of Garling DCJ and in lieu thereof order: (a) that the orders of the Judicial Registrar be set aside; (b) that the plaintiff's amended notice of motion be dismissed; and (c) that the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment