68 Bathurst Street Pty Ltd v NV Legal Pty Ltd trading as NV Lawyers [2009] NSWSC 1145
There is a serious question to be tried as to the identity of the liable party under the costs agreement; the balance of convenience favours staying the costs assessment pending clarification.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Division Corporations List / Interlocutory Application to Stay Costs Assessment
- Outcome
- Interlocutory stay of costs assessment proceedings granted until further order.
- Legal Topics
- ['assessment of Legal Costs' 'costs Agreements' 'corporate Liquidation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Equity Division Corporations List / Interlocutory Application to Stay Costs Assessment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether costs agreement was with plaintiff companies or provisional liquidator' 'Whether plaintiffs are liable for costs claimed by NV Legal Pty Ltd' 'Whether Mr Moodie had right of indemnity from companies']
Ratio Decidendi
There is a serious question to be tried as to the identity of the liable party under the costs agreement; the balance of convenience favours staying the costs assessment pending clarification.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory stay of costs assessment proceedings granted until further order.
Orders
- ["Costs assessment proceedings 2009/00197353 stayed until further order upon plaintiffs' undertaking as to damages." 'Plaintiffs to file and serve any further evidence by 2 November 2009.' 'Defendants to file and serve any further evidence by 27 November 2009.' 'Matter listed before Registrar on 30 November 2009 for...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment