R v Nabalarua; R v Quinlan [2017] NSWDC 328
The armed robbery and attempted armed robbery offences were in the middle range of objective seriousness, with planning, disguises, weapons, vulnerable victims and commission in company, but the firearms were not shown to be capable of discharge and financial gain was not treated as a separate significant aggravating factor. The offenders' childhood deprivation and disadvantage remained relevant under Bugmy despite some planning and reduced moral culpability to a degree. Each offender had demonstrated some remorse by acknowledging guilt after verdict, had some prospects of rehabilitation, and special circumstances justified a longer additional term. Parity required the same aggregate...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing / Sentence After Jury Verdicts of Guilty on Counts 1, 2 and 3 and Not Guilty on Count 4
- Outcome
- Each offender was convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment with a non-parole period of 4 years and 6 months and a total term of 8 years and 6 months.
- Legal Topics
- ['attempted Robbery While Armed With a Dangerous Weapon' 'robbery While Armed With a Dangerous Weapon' 'knowingly Drive or Be Carried in Conveyance Without Consent of Owner' 'childhood Deprivation and Disadvantage' 'bugmy Principles' 'objective Seriousness' 'special Circumstances' 'aggregate Sentence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Sentence After Jury Verdicts of Guilty on Counts 1, 2 and 3 and Not Guilty on Count 4
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentences should be imposed for attempted robbery while armed with a dangerous weapon, knowingly drive or be carried in a conveyance without consent of owner, and robbery while armed with a dangerous weapon.' "Whether the offenders' childhood deprivation and disadvantage reduced their moral culpability notwithstanding that the offences involved some planning." 'Whether aggravating factors under s 21A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) were established, including commission in company, planning, vulnerability of victims, and financial gain.' 'Whether special circumstances justified a longer than usual balance of term for each offender.']
Ratio Decidendi
The armed robbery and attempted armed robbery offences were in the middle range of objective seriousness, with planning, disguises, weapons, vulnerable victims and commission in company, but the firearms were not shown to be capable of discharge and financial gain was not treated as a separate significant aggravating factor. The offenders' childhood deprivation and disadvantage remained relevant under Bugmy despite some planning and reduced moral culpability to a degree. Each offender had demonstrated some remorse by acknowledging guilt after verdict, had some prospects of rehabilitation, and special circumstances justified a longer additional term. Parity required the same aggregate...
Court Disposition
Each offender was convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment with a non-parole period of 4 years and 6 months and a total term of 8 years and 6 months.
Orders
- ['Kareel Quinlan is convicted.' 'For Kareel Quinlan, indicative sentences were 6 years imprisonment for attempted robbery while armed with a dangerous weapon, 18 months imprisonment for knowingly drive or be carried in conveyance taken without consent of owner, and 5 years 6 months imprisonment for robbery whilst...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment