R v Kim [2020] NSWDC 589
Although the attempted sexual intercourse without consent fell in the lower range of objective seriousness, the offending involved violence, was terrifying to the victim, and ended only because of her determined resistance, so full-time imprisonment was required for denunciation and deterrence. The offender's lack of prior convictions, remorse, low risk of reoffending, good rehabilitation prospects, early pleas to two charges, judge-alone election and agreed facts warranted discounts and special circumstances, but an aggregate custodial sentence was necessary to reflect total criminality.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing / Sentence After Conviction for Attempting Sexual Intercourse Without Consent and Guilty Pleas to Sexual Touching and Common Assault
- Outcome
- Aggregate sentence of full-time imprisonment imposed.
- Legal Topics
- ['attempt to Have Sexual Intercourse Without Consent' 'sexual Touching' 'common Assault' 'judge Alone Trial Discount' 'early Guilty Plea Discount' 'aggregate Sentence' 'non Parole Period' 'special Circumstances']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Sentence After Conviction for Attempting Sexual Intercourse Without Consent and Guilty Pleas to Sexual Touching and Common Assault
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for attempting sexual intercourse without consent contrary to s61I of the Crimes Act 1900, sexual touching contrary to s61KC, and common assault contrary to s61.' 'Whether discounts should be allowed for early guilty pleas, election for trial by judge alone, and disclosure by agreed facts.' 'Whether an aggregate sentence of full-time imprisonment was appropriate.' 'Whether special circumstances justified reducing the non-parole period.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the attempted sexual intercourse without consent fell in the lower range of objective seriousness, the offending involved violence, was terrifying to the victim, and ended only because of her determined resistance, so full-time imprisonment was required for denunciation and deterrence. The offender's lack of prior convictions, remorse, low risk of reoffending, good rehabilitation prospects, early pleas to two charges, judge-alone election and agreed facts warranted discounts and special circumstances, but an aggregate custodial sentence was necessary to reflect total criminality.
Court Disposition
Aggregate sentence of full-time imprisonment imposed.
Orders
- ['The offender is sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of two years and 10 months commencing on 24 July 2019.' 'A non-parole period of 1 year and 8 months is fixed, expiring on 23 March 2021, from which date the offender is eligible to be considered for release on parole.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment