R v Mousa [2021] NSWDC 799
Although the offence involved a commercial quantity of methamphetamine and was serious, the offender's role was peripheral, unplanned and brief; the Court was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that he knew more than the reckless understanding implicit in the plea. Taking into account the s 16BA matter, the offender's almost five months in custody, a guilty plea discount of about 15%, PTSD making custody more onerous, strong evidence of remorse and rehabilitation, lack of criminal history, low risk of reoffending and very good prospects of rehabilitation, a two-year sentence of imprisonment to be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order was appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence for Commonwealth Drug Offences / Sentence Following Plea of Guilty; Commonwealth S 16 BA Schedule Matter Taken Into Account
- Outcome
- Offender convicted and sentenced to two years' imprisonment to be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order.
- Legal Topics
- ['attempt to Possess a Commercial Quantity of a Border Controlled Drug' 'aiding and Abetting Possession of a Commercial Quantity of a Border Controlled Drug' 'intensive Correction Order' 'unsworn Statements in Sentence Proceedings' 'remorse' 'rehabilitation' 'post Traumatic Stress Disorder' 'utilitarian Discount for Guilty Plea']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence for Commonwealth Drug Offences / Sentence Following Plea of Guilty; Commonwealth S 16 BA Schedule Matter Taken Into Account
Legal Issues
- 1 ["The objective seriousness and culpability of the offender's attempted possession of a commercial quantity of a border-controlled drug and the scheduled aiding and abetting matter." "Whether the offender's assistance was peripheral, unplanned and opportunistic or involved greater knowledge and culpability." "The weight to be given to the offender's unsworn letter of apology and other out-of-court material in sentence proceedings." "The significance of the offender's subjective circumstances, including PTSD, prior good character, remorse, rehabilitation prospects, time already served and low risk of reoffending." 'Whether a term of imprisonment could appropriately be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the offence involved a commercial quantity of methamphetamine and was serious, the offender's role was peripheral, unplanned and brief; the Court was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that he knew more than the reckless understanding implicit in the plea. Taking into account the s 16BA matter, the offender's almost five months in custody, a guilty plea discount of about 15%, PTSD making custody more onerous, strong evidence of remorse and rehabilitation, lack of criminal history, low risk of reoffending and very good prospects of rehabilitation, a two-year sentence of imprisonment to be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order was appropriate.
Court Disposition
Offender convicted and sentenced to two years' imprisonment to be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order.
Orders
- ['Montasir Mohamed Mousa is convicted.' 'Taking into account a discount for the plea of guilty and time already spent in custody, the offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of two years.' 'Pursuant to s 7(1) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), the sentence is to be served by way of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment