R v To [2020] NSWDC 923
The offender's conduct involved serious planned drug offending, including an attempt to possess a very large commercial quantity of pure methamphetamine and State supply offences involving substantial quantities of heroin and methylamphetamine. The Court treated the disputed coded references only as illustrative of the offender's general role in drug distribution and not as aggravating the charged offences. The offender was not a principal or organiser of the importation, but his role was above that of a mere recipient because he collected the consignment and attempted to open the concealed exhaust pipes. Balancing the objective seriousness, the need for general deterrence, the offender's...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence / Sentence Following Pleas of Guilty
- Outcome
- Sentenced to an effective overall sentence of 9 years with a 6 year minimum term.
- Legal Topics
- ['attempt to Possess Commercial Quantity of Border Controlled Drug' 'supply Prohibited Drug' 'deemed Supply' 'proceeds of Crime' 'form 1 Offences' 'objective Seriousness' 'youth and Rehabilitation' 'general Deterrence' 'de Simoni Principle']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentence Following Pleas of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for attempting to possess 11.44 kilograms pure methamphetamine as a commercial quantity of a border-controlled drug.' 'What sentences should be imposed for deemed supply of 184.3 grams of heroin and 206.3 grams of methylamphetamine, with two additional State offences on a Form 1 taken into account.' 'Whether references in text messages to a "keg of Emily" could be used consistently with the De Simoni principle.' 'What role the offender played in the drug importation and drug distribution activity.' "What weight should be given to the offender's youth, lack of prior convictions, plea of guilty, remorse, rehabilitation prospects, and deterrence."]
Ratio Decidendi
The offender's conduct involved serious planned drug offending, including an attempt to possess a very large commercial quantity of pure methamphetamine and State supply offences involving substantial quantities of heroin and methylamphetamine. The Court treated the disputed coded references only as illustrative of the offender's general role in drug distribution and not as aggravating the charged offences. The offender was not a principal or organiser of the importation, but his role was above that of a mere recipient because he collected the consignment and attempted to open the concealed exhaust pipes. Balancing the objective seriousness, the need for general deterrence, the offender's...
Court Disposition
Sentenced to an effective overall sentence of 9 years with a 6 year minimum term.
Orders
- ['For count 2, supplying a prohibited drug, namely heroin, the offender was sentenced to 2 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 12 months, commencing 7 November 2019 and expiring 6 November 2020.' 'For count 3, supplying a prohibited drug, namely 206 grams of methylamphetamine, taking into account the two...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment