Commissioner of Police v Duthie [1989] AFPDT 2
Because each member had been found not guilty and the evidence about the investigation did not establish that either member had conducted himself so as to merit denial of costs, the Tribunal ordered that the costs of the proceedings before it incurred by each member be paid by the Commonwealth.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Disciplinary Proceedings Under the Complaints (australian Federal Police) Act 1981 / Decision on Costs After Findings of Not Guilty
- Outcome
- Costs ordered in favour of the members charged.
- Legal Topics
- ['australian Federal Police Disciplinary Proceedings' 'costs Following Acquittal' 'discretion Under Regulation 7']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Disciplinary Proceedings Under the Complaints (australian Federal Police) Act 1981 / Decision on Costs After Findings of Not Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal should order that the Commonwealth pay the costs incurred by Senior Constable Kevin Carey and Senior Constable Michael Keith Duthie in proceedings before the Tribunal after each was found not guilty of improper conduct.' 'Whether differing accounts given by each member during questioning by superiors justified refusing costs.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because each member had been found not guilty and the evidence about the investigation did not establish that either member had conducted himself so as to merit denial of costs, the Tribunal ordered that the costs of the proceedings before it incurred by each member be paid by the Commonwealth.
Court Disposition
Costs ordered in favour of the members charged.
Orders
- ['The costs of the proceedings before the Tribunal incurred by Senior Constable Kevin Carey be paid by the Commonwealth.' 'The costs of the proceedings before the Tribunal incurred by Senior Constable Michael Keith Duthie be paid by the Commonwealth.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment