Roof Tile Makers (State) Award [2005] NSWIRComm 1079
The Commission determined that the offending provision of Clause 7.2.2 conflicted with section 27 of the Act and was therefore to have no effect by operation of section 27(4). It was appropriate to delete this provision from the Award and include 'responsibilities as a carer' in the antidiscrimination clause.
- Parties
- Party: CSR Limited; Party: The Federated Brick, Tile and Pottery Industrial Union of Australia, New South Wales Branch
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Award Review / Supplementary Decision
- Outcome
- Award varied. Proceedings concluded.
- Legal Topics
- Award Variation, Sick Leave, Antidiscrimination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CSR Limited
Party
The Federated Brick, Tile and Pottery Industrial Union of Australia, New South Wales Branch
Party
Procedural Posture
Award Review / Supplementary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Clause 7.2.2 of the Roof Tile Makers (State) Award contravenes section 27 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 [NSW]
- 2 Whether the antidiscrimination provisions of the Award omit reference to responsibilities as a carer
Ratio Decidendi
The Commission determined that the offending provision of Clause 7.2.2 conflicted with section 27 of the Act and was therefore to have no effect by operation of section 27(4). It was appropriate to delete this provision from the Award and include 'responsibilities as a carer' in the antidiscrimination clause.
Court Disposition
Award varied. Proceedings concluded.
Orders
- Deletion of offending provisions in Clause 7.2.2 regarding payment of untaken sick leave.
- Insertion of 'and responsibilities as a carer' at the end of Clause 1.3.1 of the Award.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment