R v Walton [2021] NSWDC 182
The combination of factors including the not strong Crown case, lengthy delay in proceedings, personal circumstances of the applicant and his family, and difficulties in preparing a defence in custody satisfied the Court that cause had been shown why detention was not justified. Proposed bail conditions sufficiently addressed any unacceptable risk under the Bail Act 2013, meriting a grant of bail.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Application / First Instance
- Outcome
- Bail granted with conditions
- Legal Topics
- ['bail' 'show Cause' 'unacceptable Risk' 'delay' 'strength of Evidence' 'preparation of Defence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant has shown cause why detention is not justified in a show cause offence' 'Whether there is an unacceptable risk if bail is granted']
Ratio Decidendi
The combination of factors including the not strong Crown case, lengthy delay in proceedings, personal circumstances of the applicant and his family, and difficulties in preparing a defence in custody satisfied the Court that cause had been shown why detention was not justified. Proposed bail conditions sufficiently addressed any unacceptable risk under the Bail Act 2013, meriting a grant of bail.
Court Disposition
Bail granted with conditions
Orders
- ['Bail is granted on conditions as outlined in paragraph [17], including conditions to be of good behaviour; to reside at 19 MacArthur Street, Griffith, with Linda Hardwick; report to police daily; not to consume alcohol or non-prescribed drugs; not to contact prosecution witnesses; a surety of $10,000; and a...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment