R v J Lucas; R v B Lucas (Bail) (No 11) [2022] NSWSC 1817

R v J Lucas; R v B Lucas (Bail) (No 11) [2022] NSWSC 1817

Joshua Lucas did not establish exceptional circumstances for bail; the Crown case against him was strong, and a risk assessment indicated the likelihood of commission of a serious offence if bailed. Benjamin Lucas did establish exceptional circumstances due to the weakness of the Crown case, good character, prolonged detention, and bail conditions could mitigate risks.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 July 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Bail Application Following Jury Trial With No Verdict on Most Serious Counts
Outcome
Joshua Lucas is refused bail; Benjamin Lucas is granted bail
Legal Topics
['bail' 'terrorism Offences' 'exceptional Circumstances' 'unacceptable Risk']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Bail Application Following Jury Trial With No Verdict on Most Serious Counts

  1. 1 ['Whether exceptional circumstances exist to warrant bail for Joshua Lucas and Benjamin Lucas' 'Assessment of unacceptable risk under the Bail Act 2013 (NSW)']

Ratio Decidendi

Joshua Lucas did not establish exceptional circumstances for bail; the Crown case against him was strong, and a risk assessment indicated the likelihood of commission of a serious offence if bailed. Benjamin Lucas did establish exceptional circumstances due to the weakness of the Crown case, good character, prolonged detention, and bail conditions could mitigate risks.

Court Disposition

Joshua Lucas is refused bail; Benjamin Lucas is granted bail

Orders

  • ['Joshua Lucas is refused bail' 'Benjamin Lucas is granted bail on conditions of utmost rigour']