R (Cth) v Mohr (No. 6) [2020] NSWSC 1942

R (Cth) v Mohr (No. 6) [2020] NSWSC 1942

Continued compliance with bail and good character are not, in this instance, sufficient to discharge the applicant's onus to show cause why detention is not justified, given the seriousness of the convicted offence, its penalty, and risk factors.

Parties
Crown: Regina; Accused: Darren Mohr
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 March 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Post Conviction, Pre Sentence, Bail Application
Outcome
Bail refused
Legal Topics
Bail, Conspiracy to Import Border Controlled Drug, Maximum Penalty, Show Cause Offence
Criminal Law Bail Conspiracy to Import Border Controlled Drug Maximum Penalty Show Cause Offence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Crown

Darren Mohr

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Post Conviction, Pre Sentence, Bail Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be permitted to remain on bail after verdict of guilty to conspiracy to import a commercial quantity of a border controlled drug

Ratio Decidendi

Continued compliance with bail and good character are not, in this instance, sufficient to discharge the applicant's onus to show cause why detention is not justified, given the seriousness of the convicted offence, its penalty, and risk factors.

Court Disposition

Bail refused

Orders

  • Bail refused. The accused must be taken into custody.