R v Jiao (No 3) [2014] NSWDC 354
Although Ms Jiao might serve a substantial part of her six month sentence before her appeal was heard, none of the possible appeal grounds identified was assessed as most likely to succeed. Weighed with the High Court considerations concerning the administration of criminal justice, special or exceptional circumstances under s 22 of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW) were not established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Bail Application / After Conviction and Sentence; Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Bail refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['bail After Conviction and Sentence' 'appeal Pending' 'special or Exceptional Circumstances' 'assessment of Grounds of Appeal' 'administration of Criminal Justice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Bail Application / After Conviction and Sentence; Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether special or exceptional circumstances existed under s 22 of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW) to justify granting bail pending appeal against conviction and sentence.' 'Whether the possible time Ms Jiao would spend in custody before the appeal was heard justified bail.' 'Whether the identified possible grounds of appeal were most likely to succeed.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although Ms Jiao might serve a substantial part of her six month sentence before her appeal was heard, none of the possible appeal grounds identified was assessed as most likely to succeed. Weighed with the High Court considerations concerning the administration of criminal justice, special or exceptional circumstances under s 22 of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW) were not established.
Court Disposition
Bail refused.
Orders
- ['Application for bail refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment